Will Landmark 1954 Brown v. Topeka Kansas Be Overturned?

In 1896, the Plessey v. Ferguson court decisionOne key finding of the study is that white
established the "separate but equal" doctrine,students are the most segregated of public school
allowing that it was legal and fair to separatestudents, attending schools that are at least 80
public school students by race and color as long aspercent white.
the education given was "equal".With the onslaught of school vouchers, charter
As history has shown, the education was seldomand alternative schools, as well as increased
fair or equal. Thus, in 1954 the landmark courtimmigration into the United States, more and
decision of Brown v. Topeka Kansas struck downmore white parents are sending their children
the 1896 decision. It outlawed racial segregation ofaway from the public school system for their
public school students, ushering in theeducation; thus, the public schools nationally are
desegregation of public school institutions acrossnow approaching 40 percent minority enrollment -
the nation from elementary through college. Publicnearly twice the amount of minority students
schools were ordered by federal mandate to useenrolled in public schools in the 1960s.
race to equitably assign children to public schools;In 1974, the Supreme Court decision of Milliken v.
thus, eliminating the segregation that previouslyBradley banned desegregation efforts between
was determined by neighborhood residency.city and suburban areas in metropolitan Detroit - a
Today, there are two cases in the U.S. Supremethird reason for the general public to believe that
Court that challenge local public school boardBrown v. Topeka Kansas may be overturned and
policies in Louisville and Seattle. The Bushanother key finding of the Harvard study.
Administration has publicly agreed with theSince the Milliken v. Bradley decision, many of the
parents, who brought the lawsuits that are inlarger cities have suffered with segregation within
favor of desegregating these schools districts.their urban areas, with mostly minorities populating
The lawsuits argue that desegregation policies arethose sections of the cities. For example, 27 of
well-intentioned but not constitutional. In order tothe largest urban public school systems serve a
be legal, desegregation policies must be based onfourth of their black and Latino student
a "persuasive good reason". The two lawsuitspopulations.
contend that no persuasive good reason exists inFourth reason, the Harvard study also found that
the Louisville and Seattle school districts, with theeven in desegregated public school systems in the
Louisville brief citing that "a well-intentioned quotaUnited States, black students are segregated
is still a quota".through student tracking and biased testing.
Many are sitting back and watching the outcomeAmerica touts itself as a colorblind society within
of these two Supreme Court cases. If the courtthis century; yet, many minorities across the
decides in favor of the parents, the ruling couldnation continue to experience a lack of quality,
possibly affect 400 school districts in 17 states,educational resources that are enjoyed by most
which continue under court-ordered desegregation.white students. Many federal and state public
Why do these parents and those againstschool funding formulas ignore the segregation
desegregation believe that now is the time toresource issues, adding to the unequitable and lack
overturn Brown v. Topeka Kansas?of resources for primarily minority public schools.
First, the Bush Administration has publiclyBig business, both domestic and abroad, already
supported not only these public school cases buthas succeeded to some degree (with government
other lawsuits, as well, that seek to eliminatesupport) in eroding the democratic right that
federal-mandated racial equity in business.everyone, regardless of race, color, creed or
Second, Harvard University's Civil Rights Projectreligion, has a right to work. Now, our public school
has shown that public schools across Americasystems are under attack. If the Supreme Court
have been resegregating during this century.rules in favor of the parents in these two cases,
Patterns of segregation exist at all levels of publicwe could very well see ourselves back in the
education - district, state, regional and nationalturbulent times of the 1950s.
levels.